Is the Problem Upper Management or the Supervisors?

In a recent blog post, James Swan spoke of a young child who was denied a First Communion because he didn’t understand what it meant.  Swan says that’s ridiculous, since 70% of Roman Catholics don’t understand Communion.  He says that this is problem of the Magisterium (upper management).

Is it?

I don’t think so, not for a second.  Upper management, in the case of the Roman Catholic Church, the Pope and the Magisterium, have taught consistently what Communion is and what it means.  I was taught, in second grade, about transubstantiation.  This should be taught today in all of the churches.

I don’t know if it is, and with good reason.  I was taught in a Catholic school that homosexuality is perfectly normal and masturbation is a natural part of growing up and those that do it shouldn’t be ashamed in the least.  One of my teachers even recommended Playboy as the porno mag that we should look at if we were curious.

Our religion books never referred to the First Person of the Trinity as “the Father” or by the male pronoun.  One of the more astute students asked our teacher why, and the teacher (different than the one above) told us that God was neither male nor female, and thus shouldn’t be referred to or thought of in those terms.

Official Catholic teachings?  Nope.  Not in the least.  The Catholic Church has always taught that homosexuality is a sin, that masturbation is “intrinsically disordered,” and that the First Person of the Trinity is God the Father.

So, if the teachings on sexuality and conception of God were really far off, then it isn’t much of a stretch to imagine that the teachings on the Eucharist were equally appalling.  This isn’t a function of upper management, as Swan accuses, but of the folks in the trenches who are teaching people contrary to official Catholic teachings.

Yes, I just defended the Roman Catholic Church.  Move along.  Nothing more to see, here!


About Cory Tucholski

I'm a born-again Christian, amateur apologist and philosopher, father of 3. Want to know more? Check the "About" page!

Posted on May 13, 2011, in Roman Catholicism and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. 2 Comments.

  1. No…..Non-Catholic.event….Brothers ..Has the Church ever infallibly defined that it is sinful to go to a.non-Catholic wedding or funeral? In the years prior to Vatican II the.idea of passive attendance developed whereby one could attend.non-Catholic services as long as one didnt actively participate in.other words the liberal idea was taught that one could go to Protestant churches .schismatic churches and perhaps even Jewish synagogues etc. for the funeral.or wedding of a relative or friend as long as one didnt actively.participate. We also talked.about it on our radio program. Obviously if one must totally.shun their religious celebrations and their buildings then one cannot.attend non-Catholic services funerals or weddings for any reason let alone to.pacify friends relatives or co-workers and give non-Catholics the false.impression that non-Catholic lives can lead to salvation or that non-Catholic.weddings are pleasing to God.

    • This isn’t exactly what I was talking about, but it’s closer than most spam comments. Therefore, I’m going to give you the benefit of the doubt that you are trying to participate in the discussion and not just advertise that website you link to. Next time, though, pick a name that’s human. I think that’s why you got flagged.

      I’m going to allow you to proceed, but with deep reservations on my part.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: