Advertisements

The Most Controversial Letter In TULIP

Read the entire article here.

When I first started studying Calvinism, I thought that the most controversial element of the TULIP was the “L”–Limited Atonement.  This is summed up in the Westminster Confession of Faith III.6:

Wherefore, they who are elected, being fallen in Adam, are redeemed by Christ, are effectually called unto faith in Christ by His Spirit working in due season, are justified, adopted, sanctified, and kept by His power, through faith, unto salvation. Neither are any other redeemed by Christ, effectually called, justified, adopted, sanctified, and saved, but the elect only. (emphasis added)

But I’ve found that everyone believes in the Limited Atonement, whether they think they do or not.  A Universal Atonement is not just logically impossible, but outright cruel.  Think about it like this: if Christ died in atonement for the sins of all of mankind, then why does God still send people to Hell?  To what point and purpose must some people pay for their sins twice, once vicariously through Christ and then again for all eternity in Hell?

It makes no sense.  Aside from that, only John 3:16 stands in support of a Universal Atonement.  In nearly all other cases where the Atonement is mentioned in Scripture, the word “many” rather than “all” refers to those effectually called and saved.  Looking back at the Old Testament, both Daniel and Isaiah confirm this idea of an elect people, or “the many” (cf. Dan 9:27 and Is 53:11-12)  Scripture teaches, therefore, that only those who die in Christ are effectually saved by the Atonement.  Even non-Calvinist writers agree on this point.

The most controversial element of Calvinism is the doctrine of predestination, which the Confession says “is to be handled with special prudence and care” (III.8).  I found out why last night as I attempted to explain this doctrine to a friend over an Instant Message.  He was aghast that I believed in this doctrine, since (in his opinion) it takes away free will.

First, before I delve into some of the finer points of the misunderstood doctrine of predestination, I must affirm that, to my surprise, Calvinism does teach that mankind has free will.  I say “to my surprise” because I resisted Calvinism for so long for the sinful allure of open theism because of the question of free will.  I made the mistake of checking what the critics said of Calvinism instead of looking at Calvinist authors like R.C. Sproul wrote on the subject.  The Westminster Confession devotes an entire chapter to the free will of man.

In summary, the Confession states that God has placed a free will that is neither good nor evil within man.  Pre-Fall, that will was good and pleasing to God, but mutable so that man could fall from his state of grace.  Post-Fall, the will of man is dead in sin and unable to will and do any spiritual good.  That means that man is unable to save himself apart from the drawing of the Father to Christ.  Upon salvation, God regenerates the sinner and endows him with complete freedom to will and do spiritual good–but not perfectly, so he is still able to will and do evil.

Knowing that Calvinism affirmed the free will of man made it a lot easier for me to call myself a Calvinist, rather than just a reluctant Calvinist.  While waiting in the long line for the most recent Harry Potter book, I had the incredible fortune to read portions of Chosen by God by R.C. Sproul, which helped me see that predestination is the ultimate expression of God’s love and grace, not the expression of tyranny that many critics of Calvinism make it out to be.

So what is predestination, exactly?  Let’s take it one step at a time, according to the Westminster Confession of Faith:

God from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass; yet so, as thereby neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures; nor is the liberty or contingency of second causes taken away, but rather established. (III.1)

So this, with the chapter on free will above, confirms that the liberty of the creatures, though the secondary cause only, does not remove the responsibility for those actions from the creature.  So if Bob murders Ted, that doesn’t make God responsible just because He made Bob and knew that Bob was going to murder Ted.

Although God knows whatsoever may or can come to pass upon all supposed conditions; yet has He not decreed anything because He foresaw it as future, or as that which would come to pass upon such conditions. (I.2)

This means that God’s will is the ultimate will: He decrees what He sees as right according to His will and pleasure, not simply because He foresaw it as a potential future.  This passage also affirms that Molinism is out of the question–God freely ordains what happens, He doesn’t place His creatures in such a way as to bring it about based on certain conditions.

By the decree of God, for the manifestation of His glory, some men and angels are predestinated unto everlasting life; and others foreordained to everlasting death.

These angels and men, thus predestinated, and foreordained, are particularly and unchangeably designed, and their number so certain and definite, that it cannot be either increased or diminished. (III.3-4)

So God knows all who will be His, and in fact has declared from the beginning who it will be.  All done according to His will and pleasure, not according to what has or will happen.  Read on:

Those of mankind that are predestinated unto life, God, before the foundation of the world was laid, according to His eternal and immutable purpose, and the secret counsel and good pleasure of His will, has chosen, in Christ, unto everlasting glory, out of His mere free grace and love, without any foresight of faith, or good works, or perseverance in either of them, or any other thing in the creature, as conditions, or causes moving Him thereunto; and all to the praise of His glorious grace.

As God has appointed the elect unto glory, so has He, by the eternal and most free purpose of His will, foreordained all the means thereunto. Wherefore, they who are elected, being fallen in Adam, are redeemed by Christ, are effectually called unto faith in Christ by His Spirit working in due season, are justified, adopted, sanctified, and kept by His power, through faith, unto salvation. Neither are any other redeemed by Christ, effectually called, justified, adopted, sanctified, and saved, but the elect only. (III.5-6)

He has selected us, and He will order the events in our lives and work on us until we are in full communion with Him.  Now, the double-edged sword of predestination–if He has chosen some for Heaven, He has necessairly chosen the rest for Hell:

The rest of mankind God was pleased, according to the unsearchable counsel of His own will, whereby He extends or withholds mercy, as He pleases, for the glory of His sovereign power over His creatures, to pass by; and to ordain them to dishonor and wrath for their sin, to the praised of His glorious justice. (III.7)

It is that part that is so controversial.  We want to believe that our will is completely free, but as I’ve seen affirmed in my own life and the lives of the many unsaved souls I work with, we are not free.  Our will is truly enslaved to sin, and it is only by professing saving faith that we are sanctified by God and can freely will to do good.  I’ve seen it over and over again, people are enslaved to their sins and they make excuses.  “Everyone does it.”  “I can stop anytime.”  “I’ll cheat on my girlfriend now to get out of my system before we get married.”  “I’m pretty good compared to that guy.”  If you’re not in Christ, do you see yourself in those excuses?

The point is that sin enslaves us and makes us unable to freely will to choose a life of righteousness.  That’s where God enters the picture.  Christ lived the perfect life so that we don’t have to, His willing sacrifice to the Father makes atonement for our sins in a way that animal sacrifices never could.  I’ve written on the Atonement before; this post is on election, so I won’t go into the particulars here.  Suffice to say that, as the apostle Paul taught, we are a new creation once we are in Christ (2 Cor 5:17), now able to will and do spiritual good.

What election boils down to is this: “We love because He first loved us” (1 Jn 4:19).  The obvious objection to that is the double-edged sword of predestination itself–how can a loving God pick and choose like that?  But there is a precedent for God not loving all of His creation equally–look at the judgments that He issued over sinful man throughout the books of the Torah.  Look at the example of Jacob and Esau (Mal 1:2-3).  Some of His creation He loves more than others, but that love isn’t based on any perceived qualities of the creature, affirmed in the Confession and in Romans 9:10-13.  It is based solely on God’s will.

Whether a person is elected to salvation, or chosen for wrath, it is all to God’s glory according to His will and pleasure.  That may sound unpleasant or even tyrannical to many.  But the fact is that we brought this judgment upon ourselves when the first of our race disobeyed God.  Remember that the Confession affirms that, even though executing our free will is only a secondary cause of an event, it does not remove any responsibility from our heads.  That Fall from grace left us unable to will to do spiritual good; we can’t even choose God over sin.  God has, in His mercy, preserved some of us from that in Christ.  I’m sure it grieves Him to have to choose, but it was a necessary consequence of the original sin that we brought upon ourselves.  We shouldn’t be blaming God for this, we should blame ourselves for necessitating the situation in the first place.

Advertisements

About Cory Tucholski

I'm a born-again Christian, amateur apologist and philosopher, father of 3. Want to know more? Check the "About" page!

Posted on February 25, 2008, in Apologetics, Sin, Theology and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. 13 Comments.

  1. Hmm. On the argument of Limited atonement. When I look at 1 John 2:2 it says ” He is the atoning sacrifice of our sin, and not only ours but also for the sins of the whole world.” It says WHOLE world, not ” the elect believers that God chose from the beginning.”
    1 timothy 2:3 says “This is good, and pleases God our Savior, who wants ALL men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth.” It continues on to verse 5 saying “who gave himself as a ransom for ALL men..” You said “In nearly all other cases where the Atonement is mentioned in Scripture, the word “many” rather than “all” refers to those effectually called and saved.” I just gave you three verses that have definite words such as “all” and “whole”. By Christ dying for all and leaving man with the choice to follow Him, it affirms that God is just ( by pouring his wrath on his Son and allowing everyone to have the opportunity to know him) and he honor his gift of free will ( by allowing the option of coming to him). Just something to consider.

  2. I’ve never really understood Calvinism, so I have some questions:

    If a person is chosen for wrath, is that person incapable of coming to Christ?

    If people are predestined according to God’s will and not by their own doing, how does He select them?

    Why does God “have to” choose?

  3. If a person is chosen for wrath, is that person incapable of coming to Christ?

    NONE of us are capable of coming to Christ on our own, elect or non-elect.

    If people are predestined according to God’s will and not by their own doing, how does He select them?

    His own pleasure.

    Why does God “have to” choose?

    The world is designed for God’s own self-glorification. As a perfect being, He knows how to build a world that maximizes His glory, and this is the world that He chose to build. Therefore, the world that best demonstrates His glory is one in which only some of the people are saved. Since we are incapable of making that decision for ourselves, He must choose for us.

  4. I can see both sides to this. But I agree strongly with Edge7’s comments. And Odgie made a good point. Why go and preach the gospel as we are charged to do if God has already picked us out? Too many scriptural contradictions my friend. GOD IS NOT THE AUTHOR OF CONFUSION. How many times must I point that out? We’ll get to the bottom of this but my brain is getting sore…

  5. Here is my final, much pondered conclusion to this whole issue of predestination: Is it even important to our salvation to know the answer? Knowledge does bringeth sorrow… for us to know for fact if predestination is true, and I feel both sides can use scripture to back themselves, is impossible. And if it is true, I couldn’t in my feeble finite human brain, conceive of the choices God has to make in regards to predestination. To have His understanding is to be like Him. And we all know what happens when we do that…
    So I feel that it is vanity. It’s back to Ecclesiastes for me in most aspects. We as Christians spend so much time trying to figure out how or why God does what He does that we waste time instead of saving souls. I don’t care if they’re predestined or not. God told us to preach the gospel so none are lost, well okay I’ll do it.
    In most instances, it’s probably best not to know how or why, because then we become sad or angry because God’s choices are not our choices.
    So if I’m predestined, the great. If it’s by our own choice, then great.
    So ultimately, I don’t know the answer.
    And I don’t care.
    Because I’m saved regardless. And that’s all I NEED to know.

  6. IT WOULD SEEM TO ME THAT GOD (BEING GOD) KNOWS, FROM THE FIRST MAN TO THE LAST MAN, WHICH WILL ACCEPT THE GIFT OF SALVATION.
    HIS KNOWING THE OUTCOME IN NO WAY CONTRADICTS HIS PREFERENCE THAT “NONE SHOULD PERISH” OR RELIEVES ME (BECAUSE I DO NOT “KNOW”) OF MY OBLIGATION TO WITNESS TO ALL MEN IF YOU WILL.
    THE ELECT, TO ME, WOULD REPRESENT THOSE, WHO BY HIS FOREKNOWLEDGE, HAVE OR WILL ACCEPT HIS GIFT OF SALVATION.

  7. If you are going for most excellent contents like me, simply pay a visit this web site all the time since it presents feature contents, thanks

  8. An outstanding share! I’ve just forwarded this onto a co-worker who has been conducting a little
    homework on this. And he in fact bought me dinner simply
    because I stumbled upon it for him… lol. So let me
    reword this…. Thank YOU for the meal!! But yeah, thanks for spending the
    time to talk about this issue here on your web site.

  9. Heya ฉัน i am กับ หลัก เวลาอยู่ที่นี่ ฉัน มาใน พบ บอร์ดนี้ และฉัน ในการหา หา มัน แท้จริง ประโยชน์ &
    มัน ช่วยให้ฉัน ออกมา มาก ฉันหวัง ให้ สิ่งหนึ่ง อีกครั้ง และ ช่วยเหลือ คนอื่น ๆ เช่นคุณ ช่วย ฉัน .

  10. สวัสดี , ฉันเชื่อ ว่าฉัน เห็น สังเกตเห็น คุณเยี่ยมชม บล็อก ของฉัน เว็บไซต์ ดังนั้น ฉัน ได้ที่นี่ มา ที่จะ กลับไป
    เลือก ? . ผม พยายามที่จะ หา ปัญหา การ ปรับปรุง ของฉัน เพิ่ม เว็บไซต์ ฉันเดา ของ เพียงพอ ทำให้การใช้ ไม่กี่ ของ คุณ แนวคิด !

  11. Wow that was odd. I just wrote an very long comment but after
    I clicked submit my comment didn’t show up. Grrrr…
    well I’m not writing all that over again. Anyway, just wanted to say superb blog!

  1. Pingback: Twenty Items of Interest (v.8) « Shane Vander Hart

  2. Pingback: Caffeinated Thoughts - » Twenty Items of Interest (v.8)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: